On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:53:17AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 19:36 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > The printf for "no signature found" is not really necessary, but i found > > it useful :-) > > Eh, I actually like the "no output if no failure" better... Feel free to > convince me otherwise, though ;)
No, that's fine. After checking the debian patches to swapon, i actually thing that writing something like Warning: removed stale suspend signature in the case that we needed to reset the signature could be useful, at least if pm-reset-swap is called unconditionally in the boot scripts, but this is not really important. -- Stefan Seyfried "Any ideas, John?" "Well, surrounding them's out." _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
