On Di Dezember 4 2007, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > But looking at the current reality. Debian and Suse's pm-utils are heavily > patched to support uswsusp. Afaik the Ubuntu development branch currently > uses Debians version. Looking at Doug's comment, gentoo also doesn't use a > vanilla pm-utils (or maybe not at all, dunno). So yeah, of the major > distros only fedora/RH use a vanilla pm-utils..
Fedora also patches pm-utils, everyone needs to use at least one patch imho. There are 5 more patches in Fedora and some bug entries in Fedora Bugzilla that require even more patches. > It would good to see some rationale from people more knowledgable in the > suspend area then myself, why they choose to go a specific way. And see if > we can get some fresh air into pm-utils :) > > Sjoerd > (On a related note, can it please switch from CVS to something people in > this century actually like to use :)) I would help forking pm-utils, but I do not dare to do this by myself. I asked for cvs commit access to help upstream, but nobody cared / read my mail or bugzilla entry, so forking seems to be the only sane way. Unless you want to abandon pm-utils, of course. Regards, Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
