2008/1/11, Till Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed January 9 2008, Victor Lowther wrote:
> > Speaking of code audits, is there a reason that the scripts are bash > > specific in places? I would think that strict POSIX sh compatibility > > would be the way to go for these scripts -- makes using them in > > embedded systems and the like easier. I'd like to second this request. > Do you have a good resource on how to convert bash features into POSIX > compatible commands? I guess bash is used, because it makes lot of stuff > easier. :-) > I know that in Debian we have tools like checkbashisms, which catches common bash only features. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
