On Jan 27, 2008 8:13 PM, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/27, Victor Lowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > on_ac_power never returns 255, so simplify our test functions. > > The original on_ac_power binary does (and we use this binary in > Debian), so I'd rather not remove this check for 255. > One downside of the pm-utils on_ac_power is, that it relies on hal. > So, maybe it would be a good idea to return 255, in case > hal-find-by-capability is not installed?
Fair enough -- the question then turns into what do we want to do on a 255 return code? On second thought, mainline never actually uses get_power_status anywhere, so we could just remove it. Anyone remember what it was originally used for? > Cheers, > Michael > > > [1] http://linux-command.5w.cz/manual/on_ac_power > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
