On Jan 31, 2008 9:07 AM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008 7:02 AM, Victor Lowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008 8:11 AM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Give this a shot: > > > > > > .SUFFIXES: .in > > > .in: > > > $(do_subst) $< > $@ > > > > > > .SUFFIXES are old-style pattern rules. This is what automake uses to > > > be portable across make variants when constricting pattern rules for > > > .c, .o, etc. > > > > Nice. Patch attached (applies on the top of the other two patches in > > this series). > > It's actually .SUFFIXES (with the leading .). I don't think SUFFIXES: > is a valid directive.
It is an automake vs. make thing -- when I tried it with .SUFFIXES, automake told me "don't do that, stupid, use SUFFIXES instead", and a bit of Googling found that automake automatically generates the right .SUFFIXES clauses when you use SUFFIXES. http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/cgi-bin/info2www?(automake)Suffixes for reference. > -- > Dan > _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
