On Fri February 8 2008, Victor Lowther wrote: > I would not add it as an intergal part of pm-utils. tuxonice, > for example, can be configured to hibernate/resume without touching a > swap partition or a swap file.
Iirc did you create some patches that separte the checks for the different sleep methods for the different backends. > Well, I would not have pm-is-supported check for the presence of an > available swap partition -- a usage scenario that would break involves > someone who normally runs without swap, and mounts the swap partition just > for hibernate How does this break? As soon as someone activates a swap partition, the output of pm-is-supported would change. And in case it is not activated, hibernation would fail anyways. Unless he uses a different sleep-backend than the kernel of course. Regards, Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
