2008/2/13, Till Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed February 13 2008, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Serious question: Why don't we just use s2ram at first place instead > > of reimplementing the functionality? I mean, we already rely on > > > Imho using s2ram (with the quirks provided by hal, and optionally > > fallback to the builtin whitelist) seems like a good solution. > > Afaik, s2ram does not support do only run the suspend quirks without doing a > suspend/hibernate by itself.
That's indeed a feature that would be useful (so s2ram could play well with tuxonice) Also pm-utils does not use the hal-info > directly, but relies on hal to be called with the appropiate parameters to > know, which quirks should be run. The same is true for s2ram. It doesn't actively query hal. It also relies on being passed the correct parameters. (as it still has a builtin whitelist, it can use that as fallback though). That's how it's currently implemented in Debian pm-utils. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
