On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/28 Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Or libexecdir if they should stay out of $PATH. I think it would be
>
> libexecdir whould make more sense indeed.
>
>
> > nice to make the package as noarch as possible, since it's almost
> > entirely scripts. Really, mostly everything would be most appropriate
> > in ${datadir}/pm-utils.
>
> Ack, moving the scripts to $datadir would be technically correct. We
> should be carful about not breaking existing scripts (again) though.
Yeah, that's really the only tough part: scripts that ".
/usr/lib/pm-utils/functions". It could be a symlink from
${exec_prefix}/lib/pm-utils/functions to
${datadir}/pm-utils/functions. Or just a simple wrapper sourcing
$PM_FUNCTIONS.
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
Pm-utils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
