On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 11:34 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Victor Lowther wrote: > > > Thoughts? > > Backwards compatibility?
The reason for the minor version bump. If you think the bump is too small, say so. > What is this complexity good for? Robustness of the suspend/resume process and better guidance for third-party hook writers about where their hooks should run. > Which use cases prove that something like > that is necessary? Right now if a hook dies we have no way of knowing whether it should be ignored or if it was handling something critical and we need to abort the suspend. Neither do we have any guidance that says "if your hook does $STUFF, it should be $HERE in the hook running sequence." That sort of guidance would make it easier for other packages (like NetworkManager) to take over maintenance of their hooks instead of leaving it up to us. -- Victor Lowther Ubuntu Certified Professional _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
