On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 17:10 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Hi, > > Victor Lowther wrote:
> > How about just passing $METHOD as the second parameter? Less parsing > > Yes, that sounds good. Basically the same, just easier to implement ;-) Done, then. > > but that should be left for pm-utils 2.x or somewhere further down the > > line. > > Ok. I need it now, since i am implementing hybrid suspend now, but as long as > we will have roughly compatible hooks in the future, we should be fine. > (I believe that you could add it now, since it will be backwards compatible - > the additional parameter would just be ignored by "old" hooks - actually, most > new hooks will still ignore it since they don't need to know). Oh, now that you brought it up, I will go ahead and implement the two-parameter thing for the hooks for 1.2 (and revise the documentation. The 2.0 thing was to no longer pass hibernate/thaw, but that is a more speculative idea. > > Depends on whether or not your in-kernel suspend is actually tuxonice in > > disguise. :) > > Ok. With "in-kernel" i actually meant the one "in-tree", but actually it's > great to have this feature in tuxonice, too. > > We'd still run hooks with (pseudo code): > > ----- > if [ $RESULT = $FROMRAM ]; then > REVERSE=resume > else > REVERSE=thaw > fi > > run_hooks $REVERSE $METHOD > ----- > > i guess? Yep. > > Does just passing $METHOD as the second parameter work for you? > > Yes, it's even easier ;-) We have a plan. > Thanks, > > Stefan -- Victor Lowther Ubuntu Certified Professional _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
