On Mon June 30 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:04:38AM -0500, Victor Lowther wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:40 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > The kernel will do a chvt even if you don't. > > > > That is an even better reason to not do a chvt if we don't have to worry > > about racing with X to reinitialize a video card. > > It's certainly an optimisation, but the time taken to switch between two > text consoles is pretty tiny.
It would be good if the chvt hook is removed from pm-utils without any regressions, because it would reduce the requirements of pm-utils. For Fedora, there was a request to remove the package that contains chvt as a dependency for pm-utils, to make it easier to creat an 64 MB image for ovirt[1]. Regards, Till [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453005
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
