Leonardo Canducci wrote: > --- Mar 7/10/08, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: >> Are you running the latest BIOS available for that machine? >> Which intel driver? "i810" (old) or >> "intel" (new)? > BIOS is up to date. I flashed it a couple of months ago with no visible > changes. > I'm using intel driver. with i810 I get the same results (but it used to work > better with suspend to ram a few months ago when I was running ubuntu). As I > said before with "vesa" driver suspend to ram work flawlessly. So the problem > must be related to the video driver.
Well, so filing a bug against the Xorg component of your distribution might help. >>> My conclusion is: there must be some magic in the way >>> s2disk/pm-suspend handles the video card... but >> what's that? Do you >>> have some hints? >> Not necessarily. It might be an issue of interaction >> between the kernel >> and the BIOS which makes s2ram only work after the resume >> routines of >> s2disk have run once. > I'd like to know if I could take advantage of such routines in some way. >> It might be an issue of "shutdown" vs. >> "platform" mode, etc. > I know nothing about that modes. Could you point me to some docs? /usr/src/linux/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt >> Generally it looks like a kernel problem, not a pm-utils >> problem. > If so what is the best place to ask? If you are not running a recent vanilla kernel, filing a bug report atainst your distribution will probably be the best idea. -- Stefan Seyfried R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
