On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Victor Lowther wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 18:45 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: >>> It would be nice if we exported the sleep.d directory directly in the >>> pm-utils.pc file instead of always assuming that it's at >>> $pm_libdir/sleep.d. >> >> That can be arranged. :) > > Might be a dumb question, but still: > Why would anyone want it not to be there? I mean it just gets more complicated > to document etc.
I'm saying that they do always want it in /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d. All I was getting at is that an external package shouldn't have to guess where that directory is. They should just ask: pmsleepdir=`pkg-config --variable=sleepdir pm-utils` or whatever the variables are named. Chances are low that this would be screwed up in a 3rd party package, but why not provide a foolproof way when we have a system (pkg-config) that perfectly encapsulates this information? -- Dan _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
