Hi Oussama,

Can you elaborate on your target deployment for billing (ie. sFlow
or promiscuous mode)? Can you also elaborate on the setup for your
test? What tool is generating sFlow data being sent to sfacctd? If
you have control over the host 192.168.42.226: which of the two
counters looks the most accurate (354000 or 1096303)?

Cheers,
Paolo

On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:05:31PM +0000, oussama sarhraoui wrote:
>  I'm actually testing pmacct tools for a potential integration into our
> system to perform billing operations . So it is important for us to get the
> most accurate information from these tools. so i run sfacctd and pmacctd on
> a local machine with host sflow configured with the ULOG facility to
> collect traffic samples with a sampling rate 1 in 100.
> i used to following configuration within sfacctd :
> 
> daemonize: true
> plugins: memory[ins], memory[outs]
> interface: eth0
> sfacctd_ip: 192.168.42.226
> sfacctd_port: 6343
> sfacctd_renormalize: true
> aggregate[ins]: dst_host
> aggregate_filter[ins]: src net 173.194.0.0/16
> aggregate[outs]: src_host
> aggregate_filter[outs]: dst net 173.194.0.0/16
> imt_path[ins]: /tmp/pmacct_ins.pipe
> imt_path[outs]: /tmp/pmacct_outs.pipe
> !
> 
> and the following for pmacctd :
> 
> daemonize: true
> plugins: memory[in], memory[out]
> interface: eth0
> aggregate[in]: dst_host
> aggregate_filter[in]: src net 173.194.0.0/16
> aggregate[out]: src_host
> aggregate_filter[out]: dst net 173.194.0.0/16
> imt_path[in]: /tmp/pmacct_in.pipe
> imt_path[out]: /tmp/pmacct_out.pipe
> !
> 
> the problem is that i found a big difference between these two tools :
>  sfacctd shows :
> 
> DST_IP           PACKETS               BYTES
> 192.168.42.226   1600                  354000
> 
> and pmacctd shows :
> 
> DST_IP           PACKETS               BYTES
> 192.168.42.226   1718                  1096303
> 
> thanks for any remarque or suggestion and for help :)
> 
> cheers.
> 
> -- 
> *SARHRAOUI Oussama *

> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to