Thanx for your answer.
I will live with it for now, and play with the files you pointed out if I
find some time to. But you are right, logic/intuition may vary a lot from
one person to another!

In the meanwhile I have tested pmapper 5-dev demo, looks very promising!
I noticed you have created a new level in the tree with the so called
'Domains', great!
I also saw that one have to choose from the Blue Marble layer or the OSM
one, both can not being displayed together, which makes sense.
If I may throw an idea here, that would be to have a separate section for
'background' layers that you can select with radio buttons like in
OpenLayers, in order to have only one of them selected at a time.

If I dare again make some proposals, the following web site (using the
complicated Mapfish) has some nice GoogleEarth and StreetView
functionalities : http://sitn.ne.ch/

Thx again for the good job!
BaK


On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Armin Burger <armin.bur...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 16/03/2012 16:35, Chris forum wrote:
>
>> Sorry, sent it too fast... here again without errors:
>>
>> Sometimes there is a category that contains only one layer, e. g. in this
>> example:
>> http://www.pmapper.net/demo/**p42/map_default.phtml?winsize=**
>> medium&language=en&config=**default<http://www.pmapper.net/demo/p42/map_default.phtml?winsize=medium&language=en&config=default>
>>
>> Category: Nature-spatial Data / Layer: Rivers
>>
>> For cases like that, is there an easy way to only display the layer in the
>> tree, in 1 line without the +/-?
>>
>
> There is in my opinion no easy way, I would even say it could be quite
> cumbersome to achieve this. You will need to modify pm.toc.js and toc.php
> and try to understand the logic there. And
>
>
>
>> That would simplify/shorten the TOC and make it more logical I think.
>>
>
> Which display is more logical than the other depends on the individual
> perception. It took me some time to set it up in the way as it currently is
> since this was what I personally found most intuitive, but of course this
> may vary much... ;-)
>
>
>  Indeed, if the layer has been collapsed while being deactivated, it is not
>> displayed into the map even if the category has got the check mark, which
>> could be confusing.
>>
>
> You can deactivate the checkboxes for the categories, this will remove a
> functionality that could be handy, but also a source of confusion.
>
> armin
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
pmapper-users mailing list
pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users

Reply via email to