Hi, On May 26, 2006, at 18:28, Matthew J Zekauskas wrote:
I believe the idea was to redo the charter with the MIB in it, but move it to TSVWG if that made more sense after the personal submission made it out.
I'd prefer to do the MIB in TSVWG, similar to how the TCP estats MIB happens there (and not in TCPM), because if anywhere in TSV, MIB people can be found in TSVWG.
Proposed: Done Reorganized Internet-Draft. Solicit implementation and field experience.Done Update Internet-Draft incorporating implementers experience, Jun 2006 Submit completed Internet-draft of the pmtud method forProposed Standard.
*If* the MIB moves to TSVWG, there may not even be a need to recharter, because PMTUD would close at that point.
Comments? Thanks, Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ pmtud mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud
