To reiterate what Matt M posted to the list yesterday: Well, the revisions took longer than I expected, and there was an error in the submission of the -08 revision (an interim version was submitted). However, the -09 version is now out, and I believe it addresses all the comments during last call. I reviewed all the modifications, and believe they are all clarifications and writing improvement.
In addition, we expect a somewhat longer-than-normal IETF last call for this document, since it is the significant output of the WG, so there should still be plenty of time to comment if you have not had a chance to do so already. Therefore, I shall submit the -09 version to the IESG for consideration as a proposed standard. Thanks to all that contributed to this draft. --Matt On 8/4/2006 9:10 PM, Matthew J Zekauskas wrote: > WGLC ended 7/24, with no dissent and three very thorough reviews. The > authors are currently revising the document to reflect the feedback > (mostly nits and clarifications, although there were two requests for > standards language (2119) insertion and some of the > clarification-related comments could trigger larger changes). > > There is already a preliminary revision available to the folks that > commented. > > Assuming the revision contains only clarifications, I will forward it > along to the IESG. If there are any significant changes, I'll do a > quick additional last call. > > Thanks to all that read the document and commented publicly. > > --Matt _______________________________________________ pmtud mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud
