On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:05:46AM -0400, Ben Wilson wrote: > On 3/27/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:55:27PM -0400, Ben Wilson wrote: > > [...] > > > However, using <code> allows web designers to style that block > > > differently than <pre> blocks. > > > > Somehow I think I'd prefer to see this done using classes -- i.e., something > > like <pre class='code'>...</pre> instead of <pre><code>...</code></pre>. > > > > I'm looking at this being a feature of standardization. Remember, I'm > rather authoritarian with a web site; unified style for multiple > authors. > [...] > However, in the end, the greatest strength for PmWiki is its > adaptability. ... I can customize <pre> and <pre><code> to my heart's > content regardless of the standard implementation. But, there's no > harm in advocating one's view during transition. :-)
Absolutely correct, on all counts. For my part, I'm just looking at it from PmWikiPhilosophy #3, which says to avoid adding a feature until there's a substantial need for it. So, I'd aim for "cookbook recipe" for now, or add it as a PITS proposal and we'll see who votes. :-) Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
