On 4/18/07, the Other michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No Hans -- you have not made any claims for ZAP insecurity -- but you > have raised a lot of negative speculation and insinuation very loudly. > > As Dan has also done the same positively regarding ZAP, and returned > the negative favor for FOX.
My apologies re: FOX. Hans does nothing but the best of work. > Also, Dan -- I think Hans has a good point re: documentation. In-code > docs are nice. > Relying on an external website that may or may not be there 3 years > from now won't help me when I'm trying to understand my code 3 years > from now and the website is gone. Self-documenting code is always the > goal, of course -- and there's only so far one can go. Mirroring key > docs on PmWiki would be good -- Jiri does this for the JITS zap-based > system. There are additional concerns re: mirroring doc-changes from > one site to PmWiki; but I know that if Jiri's site goes down, the docs > are still available at PmWiki.org I'll make a point to add at least a bit more documentation in the actual code in an upcoming release. This is a good point. > FOX & ZAP both have their unique uses; it's a pity they aren't better > integrated. Agreed. And I do know ZAP has benefited from FOX as I used at least one idea from Hans that cut out nearly 100 lines of inefficient code. I've also come to greatly appreciate the advantages of in-page comment insertions which I abandoned back while ZAP was still FASTdata. On my own production site I've recently decide to use FOX's approach as it does make things easier to maintain. I should further add I make extensive use of Hans' LWS recipe, and his ShowHide recipe--and recommend their use with ZAP on ZAP's support site. They are both great scripts. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users