Beside the "Status:" there is a -Talk page, too. At pmwiki.org is a page http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/PmWikiUsers
How about <Recipe>-Talk #RecipeUsers section with users recommendation. I think it could be useful even it's on the users goodwill. Regards, Jiri Patrick R. Michaud napsal(a): > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:19:42PM +0200, kjettil wrote: > >> My assessment of ZAP is now clear - thanks to the contributions over the >> last 36 hours! But normally, it's a time consuming process to find out >> which ones are in the rough. >> > > I agree that it is very difficult to split the cookbook into > "stable" versus "beta" groups, and it would also be difficult > to move them from one group to another. > > This is also why we have the "Status:" line for each recipe. > > This does bring up another thought... as opposed to having > "ratings" or "voting" on recipes [1], what if we called them > "endorsements"? > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wiki.pmwiki.user/41611 > > Pm > > > _______________________________________________ > pmwiki-users mailing list > pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com > http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users > > __________ Informace od NOD32 2232 (20070430) __________ > > Tato zprava byla proverena antivirovym systemem NOD32. > http://www.nod32.cz > > > > -- OBUTEX s.r.o Ing.Jiří Hladůvka Zlatovská 22 911 01 Trenčín tel.: +421 (0)32 6587000 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.obutex.com _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users