Friday, May 11, 2007, 2:53:29 PM, Russ Fink wrote: > Hi, why are there two recipes that do basically the same thing, includesite, > and includeurl? They seem functionally equivalent, but mutually agnostic. > Can someone fix this up, or recommend which one should be used?
IncludeSite displays an external url in an <iframe> tag. IncludeUrl are actually two recipes: a markup which includes a url but does not embed it, and a script which can display an external url or internal filepath as an ebedded object. It uses the <object> tag, except for IE, where it uses <iframe>. It also has an option to set $EnableExternalResource = 0; which will disable the use of external urls (starting with http: or https: ) for sites which want to include internal html pages via a filepath, but want to prevent inclusion of external pages. I don't know what you mean with mutually agnostic? One should only use one or the other, as they use the same markup. No point installing both. ~Hans _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
