Congratulations Dan, your my hero here. You made a great, no exceptional, 
contribution. 

You're probably thinking of getting out of this community, feeling molested 
right? Imagine, a member you held in esteem (he even played a role in you 
coming to pmwiki), kicks you in the balls. And then the list-owner goes in for 
the kill. Must get a little chilly to say the least. 

I know your presence on this list may seem clumsy or overdone to some, with 
high exposure levels, but you're keen, helpful and original. Sure, you made 
some stupid remarks, even offended Pm, but your main line typically is to get 
things back on track. 

Replying must have gotten boring lately. Other members don't even seem to look 
at what you or your wiki are, they just look at what it is *not*. Wow, how do 
you reply to that?! 

So it's American football. It's all in the game, it's only for men and face it, 
you're not. Your call for respect is totally brutally brought to the ground. 

My 2 cents are that you succeeded in getting abused by the 2 most eloquent 
members on this list. Have no doubt, I blame them for it. They are elder and 
have other options at their disposal. They were minimally creative. 

The other members replying to this thread just want all this to end. But they 
end up blaming you for this thread going astray, really putting the insult 
("Get Out") to injury. 

All in all people should have responded more calmly or not have replied at all. 
Why the hurry? This was to be your day of glory. 

Now mind you, this is all your own doing if you come into the kitchen and just 
expect the chefs to work with you. Hey, you probably can't even properly cook 
an egg. 

But you know, the chefs don't (want to) own the restaurant. They abuse, but 
they apologize. They aren't as tough as their pans. Accept the deal that lets 
you concentrate on your strengths and they on theirs. 

Or maybe get out and invite Pm to take part on the mailing list. That would 
leave the community intact. 

It seems our messages crossed. I just saw your message. Read on below for a 
little in more "in-depth discussion". 

/jm







ps I enjoyed reading about the wiki-clock. I wish it had more controls and some 
internationalization because the time confused me :) The idea is great, the 
implementation is a joke :) 
For the sake of internationalization could we instead of some specific 
time-format move to some measure of earth's rotational position? Relative to 
the sun? Or even the universe, which means seasons become more visible in the 
hours daylight hits us. 
When the earth moves around the sun, does this add or subtract a day from the 
year, just as Jules Vernes traveller around the world found he had won another 
'day'? And if we base the day on the earth's rotation relative to the universe, 
will our day then shorten or lengthen? 
Summarizing, the wiki-clock provoked not-so-bad ideas, ideas I didn't have 
before.  It educates about time, the solar system and rotational position and 
how intricate relative movements are underly in our measurements of time. 
Catalysts may be useless to some, but they allow substances to be converted 
under low-energy conditions, effectively enabling progress. The mind has its 
own. 


Wikis are just like programming languages. They come in flavors and almost any 
language can theoretically do anything you want, but the point is how they get 
you there. Some just make you sick. 

Dan basically aims for a wiki that's visual. That means it shows you the data 
(or even the code) it's configured with. So if you don't like or trust it, you 
can see it and change it, right there and then. I attended that same class. I 
don't want the system to be code, I want it to be data. Wikis (and pmwiki) 
represent a great platform for this. 

PmWiki is moving in that visual direction. But it is written with an emphasis 
on the site admin and things are typically configured from config.php. But all 
that that means is that there is a well-defined interface to get things done. 
It is the foundation needed to which the future visual interfaces (of which 
only a few now exist) can write to. 

Dan needs more visuality now, because it fits him as a user. It is also an area 
where more expertise must stil be developed, it is an unexplored space which 
must still be chartered. Pioneering is needed and many design revisions will 
take place before setling. This is where PmWiki will always spawn forks: Pm 
controls the code but pioneers need to break away and experiment, for example 
with hierarchies. 


In analogy with languages, Dan probably wants all his wiki elements to 
explicitly be "first-order", just as they are in more modern generalized 
languages. Now this is not something typical users can easily put in words. 
They just become good in workarounds and call that programming. It used to 
brings in their pay-checks, but clients basically got ripped off by getting 
highly programmer dependent systems. 

In my own words such systems integrate a higher level of incompetence. Yet the 
programmer seems like a really heroic guy integrating incompetence - and in a 
way he truely is. 

Now there are members on this list with a very thorough background in 
programming (e.g. Patrick) and they know exactly what I mean. They will surely 
attest that Dan is (at least academically) on the right track, despite his 
otherwise lacking programming abilities. They will also assert that minimal 
viable such systems do *not* require more infrastructure. 

In other words, all that Dan has said in other words. Kudo's to Dan. 



_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! Check out the New 
MSN Mobile! 
http://mobile.msn.com
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Reply via email to