Two potential issues with moving to github: 1) the standard is to put issues onto github; this would mean there is both github issues and PITS issues.
2) Petko and Pm might start looking like this third panel: [image: Not Invented Here strip for 2/6/2014] http://notinventedhe.re/on/2014-2-6 -Michael Paulukonis http://www.xradiograph.com <http://goog_2112721603>Interference Patterns (a blog)<http://www.xradiograph.com%5Cinterference> @XraysMonaLisa <https://twitter.com/XraysMonaLisa> http://michaelpaulukonis.com <http://www.BestAndroidResources.com> Sent from somewhere in the Cloud (hearthrug, by the fender) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, michael paulukonis < [email protected]> wrote: > After an initial experience where I could not figure out git, I've been > using it for the past year far more than any other source control system. I > use BitBucket for private repos, and GitHub for public. The ease of use has > gotten me to dump just about everything in there, and even finally do some > proper branching for changes. > > While GitHub is "in-the-cloud" and not your own data (and thus close to > the devil incarnate, if you ask RMS), it works just fine for me. Some > people like Gitorious. Savannah no longer accepts non-GNU projects, it > seems. > > > -Michael Paulukonis > http://www.xradiograph.com > <http://goog_2112721603>Interference Patterns (a > blog)<http://www.xradiograph.com%5Cinterference> > @XraysMonaLisa <https://twitter.com/XraysMonaLisa> > http://michaelpaulukonis.com > <http://www.BestAndroidResources.com> > > Sent from somewhere in the Cloud > (hearthrug, by the fender) > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Patrick R. Michaud > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:00:14AM -0500, michael paulukonis wrote: >> > How can one contribute to the code? I'm not finding it quickly on the >> wiki >> > [...] >> > The SVN page only discusses how to pull the code, not to offer changes: >> > http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/Subversion >> >> For a while I've been toying with the idea of moving PmWiki's >> source to GitHub. It's not as simple as just converting the >> subversion repository to git, though -- we have a lot of >> packaging and build tools that rely on Subversion, and those >> would also need converting. >> >> Any opinions from the crowd on moving to git/GitHub? >> >> (There's also a tags problem in PmWiki's subversion history >> left over from the days of using CVS, and last time I did a test >> git conversion all of that had to be manually managed and >> was Not Fun.) >> >> Pm >> > >
_______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
