Usually, 60 is enough. There are times that we blow through that number -- having both of them around covers the bases. And allows the user to load as few changes as necessary.
Adding more breaks (anchors) into the larger list sounds great! -Michael Paulukonis http://www.xradiograph.com <http://goog_2112721603>Interference Patterns (a blog)<http://www.xradiograph.com%5Cinterference> @XraysMonaLisa <https://twitter.com/XraysMonaLisa> http://michaelpaulukonis.com <http://www.BestAndroidResources.com> Sent from somewhere in the Cloud (hearthrug, by the fender) On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Petko Yotov <[email protected]> wrote: > StefCT writes: > >> I like your idea. The AllRecentChanges page is a great tool for keeping >> track of what the PmWiki community is up to, for catching the occasional >> spammer and even - through the "Summary" field - a means of >> communication for some users. >> > > Yes, this is a really great side effect. :-) > > > I also agree that AllRecentChangesShort >> has become somewhat too short (at least for the moment). >> > > We can increase the number of pages in the AllRecentChangesShort page if > this will save us time. Will 100 pages be better? > > Petko > > > > _______________________________________________ > pmwiki-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users >
_______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
