On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 19:15 +0300, Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: > On 05/20/2013 07:05 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I think this has the meaning that even FreeBSd is capable of having > > OpenCL. Thanks! > > Great! Perhaps you could volunteer as a FreeBSD tester for the > 0.8 release and contribute test log entries during the 0.8 > stabilization? > > Then we could advertise the FreeBSD port in the release notes if > it turns out passing the testing. > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pocl/index.php?title=Release_plan_for_pocl_0.8 > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pocl/index.php?title=ReleaseTestLog >
Pekka, what do I have to do to contribute test logs? At the moment, I can build pocl-0.8 (lates source, have fixed the AC_MSG_WARN issue), but not all tests passes. There is also an issue with ocl-icd loader: POCL and ocl-icd install OpenCL[.a|.so] into the same place, ocl-icd names its lib libOpenCL.so.1, while POCL is libOpenCL.so.2. Since I want to have ocl-icd or any icd as an option in the FreeBSD port (as long as this is possible), I need to circumvent this problemacy. What is the PCOL way when having installed multiple platforms (name of the standard path, like /usr/local/lib/pocl/)? Oliver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________ pocl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
