Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> In other words, L<Pod::Parser> is likely to be rendered simply as >>> "Pod::Parser", but I don't know what to do with L<perlfunc/die> or >>> L<"Theory of MIMEs">. > >> Just strip the L<> and leave the contents of the link as-is? > >Do you think that will make sense enough for entries like perlfunc/die? >Or perlre/"Regular Expressions" or something like that?
If it doesn't isnt there now a form of L<> which allows text seen to be specified? -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
