Sean M Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, I'm thinking of saying that =headN's can't be inside =over's, so > that if such is found, it will DWIMically close the open =over. But > going the other way, I'm thinking "no way, there's nothing wrong with > having a =headN inside an =over! Don't OPPRESS ME with your rules, you > FASCIST! ATTICA!!! ATTICA!!!!".
> Anyone have any preferences either way? I think I might be leaning > toward the former approach (where =headN closes =over) just because I > think most cases of people apparently having a =head1 inside an =over > are actually mistakes and that they really meant to close the =over. This has in my experience always been an error. I'd automatically close and additional issue a warning when run through a checker/lint tool. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
