Hi, The PoDoFo Library is licensed unter the LGPL, whereas the tools are licensed under the terms of the GPL. There is plenty of information about the differences of these licenses available on the net, so I do not think PoDoFo has to create a list of its own.
For you it might be important, that you may link LGPL code with a commercial
application, but no GPL code. But you did not want to link to podofoimpose,
did you?
Best regards,
Dom
Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Harald Weinhandl:
> In the info there is a note about
>
>
>
> PoDoFo is licensed in parts under the GPL and the LGPL.
>
>
>
> With GPL it can not be used in commercial software, is there a list of
> where these differences are.
>
>
>
> So for example I can use core PoDoFO but samples like PoDoFoImpose I can
> not, is that correct? ( unless you follow the strict GPL code )
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Harald
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> New, Used, Demo, Dealer or Private? Find it at CarPoint.com.au
> http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/206222968/direct/01/
>
--
**********************************************************************
Dominik Seichter - [email protected]
KRename - http://www.krename.net - Powerful batch renamer for KDE
KBarcode - http://www.kbarcode.net - Barcode and label printing
PoDoFo - http://podofo.sf.net - PDF generation and parsing library
SchafKopf - http://schafkopf.berlios.de - Schafkopf, a card game, for KDE
Alan - http://alan.sf.net - A Turing Machine in Java
**********************************************************************
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
