On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 20:27 +0000, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> please review and consider applying the patch attached to
> this e-mail instead of the one attached to the e-mail I'm
> replying to. The new one also fixes a misleading comment
> and adds a comment for finding int64_t without stdint.h
> being available. On LP64 platforms, this (and the older)
> patch has probably no effect on the type used (untested).
Hi,
the patch looks fine from my point of view, thus I committed it as
revision 1686:
http://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/code/1686
Bye,
zyx
--
http://www.litePDF.cz [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
