On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:43 +0000, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> thanks for accepting/committing the patch and your
> apologies. I am sorry for not implementing PdfFontFlags,
> which is because I have to study, do you still want it?
Hi,
honestly, having a class for something what is naturally an (unsigned)
integer, or an enum, feels like an unneeded complexity of the API.
> I have posted (and probably will post) some documentation
> patches and a build system patch today, but I can't test
> because of that, sorry. So if I post some code change,
> could you with commit access please test/review it?
If you mean that you send code patches which you actually didn't test,
then, well, it doesn't work this way. Do not expect anybody doing "the
hard work" for you. I do some smoke testing before committing, but also
nothing deep. I hope you test code changes at least on one platform,
like when you sent a Win32 build patch, then I expect that you also
tested it in the Win32 environment.
Please be aware of a fact that I am _not_ a PoDoFo developer, whatever
I do for PoDoFo I do in my free time, which is quite limited. There are
other people with commit rights, thus asking namely me doesn't help
anything (unless it's part of an ongoing discussion/review, of course).
You already noticed that my response can take several weeks, thus you
have a little overview of my free time availability.
Like in any Open Source project, any contribution is highly welcome,
thus do not hesitate to send your changes into the list. There will be
someone reviewing and eventually committing your changes, sooner or
later.
Bye,
zyx
--
http://www.litePDF.cz i...@litepdf.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
