On 1/19/16, 12:35 AM, "Paolo Bolzoni" <paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do you mean the resource name used to refer to them from content streams? >> The value of the Name key in the Font dictionary? >As far as I understood the second one. OK - you can do that if you want. >> What do you hope to gain by doing so? Would you do this only for embedded >> fonts? >I won't gain anything from it. But the idea come when I was reviewing >a .pdf and I noticed that a part of the total lack of metadata there >were no meaningful font names. All fonts were embedded and the names >were like "XXXXX1." That wasn’t necessarily someone doing anonymization - that was simply an implementation detail of the PDF producer’s font embedded code and/or the type of fonts being used. >Since it was asked to submit double blind papers I actually apreciated >the care the author used. Why would the name of the fonts being used expose any PII? And I would think that there are many other pieces of things in that PDF that would be more “telling” - if someone was actually interested in looking. >It is possible only for embedded fonts otherwise the viewer won't be >able to find them in the system. That is correct - just checking that you knew :). Leonard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
