On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 13:48 +0300, Nikita Shlyapnikov wrote:
> ...
Hi,
right, the standard can be interpreted in multiple ways, especially
when it comes to recommendations.
> /F(....../text.123.4df.txt)
Okay, so they actually do not replace the dots in the /F, but keep them
as they are (I suppose they are ASCII dots, not Unicode dots), just as
you suggested. Nonetheless, they still break the file name, due to
limitations on the backward compatibility, thus you cannot rely on
the /F. You can (and should) rely on /UF.
If you are willing to extend your patch to behave the same as they do,
and write tests for it, then it'll be great. If not, then let me know.
By the way, that the file names are shown properly (for eye reading,
not necessarily for byte-match) is caused by showing the /UF value in
the UI, which makes sense and is no problem with current PoDoFo.
Bye,
zyx
--
http://www.litePDF.cz i...@litepdf.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
