On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 20:38 +0100, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> - it isn't a "crash" (segfault, abort by SIGABRT or similar)
Hi,
I see. It looks like I did something wrong when testing the change.
When trying once again now I can confirm what you see, the change does
fix the CVE. I do not know what I did wrong the last time, I'm sorry
about that.
I committed the patch as revision 1872:
http://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/code/1872
Bye,
zyx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
