On 23 February 2018 at 13:41, zyx <z...@gmx.us> wrote: > other projects I work on use > #include <path/file.h> > in public headers, where the path depends on the provided include > directory in their .pc files or such. When you make it just > #include "file.h" > then it can break, especially when the project being compiled also > contains the same file. >
Wait, wait: I don't want anyone to switch to #include <podofo.h>. The change I made should theoretically support both #include <podofo/podofo.h> and #include <podofo.h> . Does it really break for you? > Changing the directory structure is better done in-place, such patches > would be horrible to verify and so on. Not talking about its size and > the need to svn actually understand the move operation, to keep the > history of the changes properly. > Agreed. > > As I said before, I'm against changing the public headers. > Me neither: I made the change with the intention to not break anyone. > Not a question for me, but my opinion is: no. I'm not a fan of github > myself, just the opposite. There had been brought this question on the > list in a not so distant past too. > I will look for past messages. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users