On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:09 AM stefa...@t-online.de <stefa...@t-online.de>
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out Michal!
>
>
>
> > To read acroforms correctly using current podofo
>
> > you need to check whether has annotation Parent key
>
> > and if yes then create PdfField instance from it instead
>
> > of from annotation itself. As also states pdf reference
>
> > Ff key is inheritable like FT and some other keys.
>
>
>
> Do you have some pseudo or can you point to some example code that
> demonstrates how to do this?
>
For example:
```
PdfAnnotation *annot = page->GetAnnotation(i);
PdfObject *parent = annot->GetObject()->GetIndirectKey("Parent");
if(parent) // or maybe also add "&&
!annot->GetObject()->GetDictionary().HasKey("Ff")" or check for "FT" key or
"T" key
{
use PdfField curField(parent, annot)
}
else
{
use PdfField curField(annot->GetObject(), annot)
}
```
In this way can be used curField.GetType() or one can manually read FT, Ff
and other keys by traversing through "Parent path" if specified key in
actual node is missing (as pdf reference does not says that also Parent
cannot have another Parent and so on).
>
> > Either podofopdfinfo info is wrongly reading
>
> > acroforms or bug is in podofo depending on point of view
>
>
>
> Do you think it makes sense to file a bug report for this issue?
>
Yes podofopdfinfo is incorrect and podofo function GetType should return
correct annotation type (at least).
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
