On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 19:47 +0100, Michal Sudolsky wrote:
> I do not see any reason why would be better to use preprocessor to
> switch between "&data[0]" and "data.data()"
Hi,
there might be a reason why the vector::data() had been added. Maybe
it's a cleaner way to access the data. Also, as you said, if the data
is NULL, then dereferencing it will cause a crash.
> There never been "finally" or "__finally" in C++ standard.
> ....
> If you meant that Microsoft extension __finally.
I see. I know compilers have their own language extensions, I kind of
expected the __finally or finally or some such being available in some
form everywhere. Or I'm just too used to the C++ Builder. In any case,
my fault.
> Or simply put "delete[] buffer" on all relevant places
> before PODOFO_RAISE_ERROR as is now done with TIFFClose.
>
> But C++ way is much better and far less error prone.
Definitely, I agree.
Bye,
zyx
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
