Hello guys,

I'm sorry, I made a mistake in assuming that Dominik was available in
these weeks. I am not comfortable in holding this meeting without him,
so let's just delay it (I just deleted the doodle). Still I think it
was useful as we identified that Wednesday was preferred by most
people. I'm talking with Dominik right now: most probably we will
reschedule the event for Wednesday May 18th. I will update you soon.

Cheers,
Francesco


On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 13:55, Dominik Seichter
<domseich...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for organizing this @Francesco Pretto !
> I am sorry to say that I cannot make it this week and/or the week after. 
> Sorry, for the short notice.
>
> Still, feel free to discuss next steps and do not hesitate to start the 
> meeting series without me.
>
> Best regards,
>  Dominik
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:24 AM Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I remember everyone to answer to the Doodle:
>>
>>      https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/e5yK03qe
>>
>> So far the most voted day is next Wednesday, at 15.30 CEST. I think at
>> this point that probably the event will be held within strict workdays
>> (Mon-Thu, better exclude Friday). Since some people may want to join
>> but prefer evenings, including one person that did patch reviews and
>> may hold some stakes, I added another option on Wednesday May 11th,
>> 17.30-19.00 CEST. I guess we all have a job, and that would basically
>> be a late call of the day, possibly prolonging the work day a bit, and
>> also people that can't have calls regarding PoDoFo during their job
>> could at least get a (small) leave to finish job earlier that day and
>> be able to join the meeting. I ask people that voted so far to also
>> express availability/unavailability for that day, and add some more
>> availabilities. I remind you that the scope of these doodles is to try
>> to maximize participation and that there is also the yellow "if need
>> be" option where you can state an availability that is not comfortable
>> for you but still feasible.
>>
>> Thank you again!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 13:56, Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello PoDoFo maintainers/devs,
>> >
>> > I got some replies to the meeting poll and decided to create a doodle 
>> > based on the results, which I attached. Looking at results, there's seems 
>> > to be a preference on attending during working days/hours, so I put most 
>> > options on those time slots, with a couple exceptions (late Friday 6th and 
>> > morning Saturday 7th).
>> >
>> >     https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/e5yK03qe
>> >
>> > What I would like to discuss, with a tentative schedule:
>> > - [15min] Quick introductions, description of PoDoFo usage;
>> > - [10min] pdfmm improvements over PoDoFo, propose to merge back;
>> > - [25min] PoDoFo relicensing to more permissive license: yes/no, which one;
>> > - [25min] PoDoFo development model, responsibilities, git adoption.
>> >
>> > Suggestions are welcome, but for such schedule I believe 1h and 15 min is 
>> > the bare minimum, and there may be no time to take decisions or discuss 
>> > many topics. We'll see, but please be open to stay few more minutes more. 
>> > Also on late Friday and Saturday morning there may be more time to discuss 
>> > topics more in depth, hence I created longer meeting slots in those days. 
>> > About which conference room to use: there's seems to be a slightly 
>> > preference of using Google Meet, which the second runner Microsoft Teams. 
>> > Google Meet works well without any application, so I think we should use 
>> > that this time, with possibility to switch to Discord for quick 
>> > chats/talks.
>> >
>> > Please, fill the doodle as well and thank you very much for your 
>> > participation!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Francesco
>> >
>> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 20:55, Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello PoDoFo devs,
>> >>
>> >> last Sunday I wrote in another thread about an attempt to organize a
>> >> PoDoFo virtual meeting. While Dominik told me such events were never
>> >> organized nor needed to aid PoDoFo development, I think having one in
>> >> this phase may help to revive interest in PoDoFo and be a very good
>> >> opportunity to meet each other. I already had the chance to talk with
>> >> Dominik face to face last week and it was very useful and interesting
>> >> to me: enlarge the meeting to previous and current maintainers, patch
>> >> contributors and all people interested in PoDoFo development would be
>> >> a good step in improving understanding who is using PoDoFo (and for
>> >> what) and would certainly aid future steps being taken, other than
>> >> helping to renovate a sense of community. Of course you already know I
>> >> have several purposes about development PoDoFo, which possibly I would
>> >> like to present and discuss. It's clear that PoDoFo has a small user
>> >> base/community behind, but I still invite you to fill the form I
>> >> created and state your interest/preferences:
>> >>
>> >>     
>> >> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdAQrk_ktmgzJI_eZvevfvAlfG5EsttVftouNO3cfUKT2uUig/viewform?usp=sf_link
>> >>
>> >> Depending on the responses on this I will then prepare a doodle to try
>> >> set a meeting date. Also I remind you I created an experimental
>> >> #PoDoFo discord channel:
>> >>
>> >>     https://discord.gg/SAVm4DVN
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your support in this initiative!
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Francesco
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Podofo-users mailing list
>> Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users


_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to