Hi,
while I've been replying to a private request derived from a public
thread (who likes these?), I realized I cannot build PoDoFo at
r2063 anymore, due to:

In file included from /usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:8,
                 from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCase.h:6,
                 from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCaller.h:5,
                 from /usr/include/cppunit/extensions/HelperMacros.h:9,
                 from .../podofo/trunk/test/unit/StringTest.h:24,
                 from .../podofo/trunk/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:21:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h: In instantiation of
‘typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value),
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type
CppUnit::StringHelper::toString(const T&) [with T = PoDoFo::PdfString;
typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value),
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type =
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]’:
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:74:50:   required from ‘static
std::string CppUnit::assertion_traits<T>::toString(const T&) [with T =
PoDoFo::PdfString; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]’
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:168:58:   required from ‘void
CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, SourceLine, const
std::string&) [with T = PoDoFo::PdfString; std::string =
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]’
.../podofo/trunk/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:182:5:   required from here
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: error: no match for
‘operator<<’ (operand types are ‘CppUnit::OStringStream’ {aka
‘std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream<char>’} and ‘const
PoDoFo::PdfString’)
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~

It looks like there's missing some operator definition. I did not look
any deeper on this. I'm not sure whether it would make any sense, if
the pdfmm project is supposed to be merged back soon (I did not try to
build that one).
        Bye,
        zyx


_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to