Hi Francesco!
You are absolutely right, the issue seems to be fixed in 0.9.x on Jan 2. Sorry for not checking first, I did not update for a long time, considering we might rather change do PoDoFoMM. Regards Uli Von: Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Mai 2023 13:03 An: Ulrich Arnold <ulrich.arn...@t-online.de> Cc: podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Podofo-users] Patch for PoDoFo Build 2033 Hello, you may be aware that PoDoFo repository has moved to github, also for 0.9.x[1] code. I'm sorry, I don't want to be involved with legacy code maintaining but I remember that before pushing PoDoFo-next (now 0.10.x) I actively reviewed a pull request for something that may be your exact issue[7], and the PR was eventually merged. Can you check and confirm it? Cheers, Francesco [1] https://github.com/podofo/podofo/tree/0.9.x [2] https://github.com/podofo/podofo/pull/7 On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 12:54, Ulrich Arnold <ulrich.arn...@t-online.de <mailto:ulrich.arn...@t-online.de> > wrote: Hi! I think I found a small bug in the code for setting creation- and modification-date. At least in the WIN32-branch daylight-saving-time is not taken into account, resulting in Acrobat showing the time 1 hour off. According to Pdf-Docs 1.7 chapter 7.9.4 the time format is local time followed by the absolute difference to UTC. For Germany this would be +1h due to time zone, but +2h during active daylight-saving-time. Attached is the patch against build 2033. I don’t know, whether it is necessary in the other branch as well. Regards Uli _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
