Euh, well, I was meaning option A. But either A or C is good for me. Option B is too awkward as a bad API would stay forever and would bite any new Server::TCP user.
Le 21 juillet 2009 12:37, Olivier Mengué <olivier.men...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > 2009/7/16 Chris 'BinGOs' Williams <ch...@bingosnet.co.uk> > >> Anyways, I see three options: >> >> a). Make the functionality match the documentation; >> >> b). Make the documentation match the functionality; >> >> c). Do what dngor suggests and flatten ClientArgs, forget the socket >> and document as such. >> >> Cheers, >> > > As a POE::Component::Server::TCP user (useful to quickly write tests for > client components), I prefer option C as I complained about 2 months ago : > http://www.mail-archive.com/poe@perl.org/msg04260.html > > Olivier Mengué. >
