In SSTRecord, there is a private List _record_length. It doesnt seem to be set any where, but its passed to SSTSerializer, where get is called. I am obviously missing something, but cant figure out what. Help! :)
Thanks - Avik Quoting Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A map interface should be fine. > > I've been slowly refactoring this code but I'm not really done yet. > > The implementation should remain a BinaryTree because we need to > efficiently > lookup from both the key side and the value side. > > Regards, > > Glen Stampoultzis (TriNexus Pty Ltd) > Fixed:+61 3 9753-6850 Mob:+61 (0)402 835 458 > ICQ: 62722370 EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > URL's: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi, http://www.krysalis.org > > > In trying to do STRING records for formulas, i was looking at the SST > > serializer and deserializer. In both of them, there is a BinaryTree > object > > called "strings" that is used to hold strings. Withing these classes, > only > the > > Map interface methods are used, and the BinaryTree methods are used only > from > > SSTRecord. I am therefore planning at changing the interface for > SSTSerializer > > and Deserializer to accept a generic Map. > > > > So, was there any other reason why its a BinaryTree reference internally? > Else > > i will go ahead and do that change. It'll help me in string record. > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
