DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22458>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22458 Ever considered using GNU Trove ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-15 13:46 ------- You have a sick sense of humor my friend or You managed to NOT read the press.... The following articles were primarily bound in my desire to use GNU Trove: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10574 http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10550 http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/07/17/ 2257224.shtml?tid=108&tid=117&tid=126&tid=156&tid=99 http://linuxintegrators.com/archive/hl30/technology/?permalink=LGPL+in+Java.html http://linuxintegrators.com/archive/hl30/technology/ ?permalink=what+to+do+about+the+LGPL+in+Java+.html In the end we discovered LGPL is okay for situations where you can avoid distributing the LGPL library and still have the software work. There aren't really any such situations in POI. The issue is with section 6 of the LGPL. Unless the Trove developers would give us special dispensation to release trove sans section 6, we're pretty much stuck. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
