On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:03:02PM +0930, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > At 03:25 PM 9/10/2003, you wrote: > >Yes. Although the changes to POIFS will not have a tremendous initial > >impact on performance since HSSF will still be buffering all of the > >records (I have ideas for changing that, but it is a lot of work). > > I was suspecting this to be the case. I was hoping that the performance > would be comparable at least and that memory usage would be the same or > better. If this is the case we could pick your implementation and run with > that and then work towards providing an implementation of HSSF that can > take better advantage of the new API.
Memory use should probably be ~50%, since only HSSF will be buffering, instead of HSSF *and* POIFS. Also, the streams you don't care about won't have to be read in. Performance should improve at least a little as a result. Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
