I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build followed by a prod build?
The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1). -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. > From: Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:32:16 +1100 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] New development build > > > I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production > build. > > Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the > development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we > could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care. > > Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's. > > BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for this > release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end of Feb > anyway. Anyone got a conversion script? > > > > > Glen Stampoultzis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
