actually, we should move jakarta-poi-3 to jakarta-poi ..
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:41 +0100, Nick Burch wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Avik Sengupta wrote: > > There should be an xml file in the gump cvs that defines the project. > > Nick, you should have access, by default. > > OK, I've updated the definitions for jakarta-poi-3. Without knowing more > about gump, I can't see how to tell it to pull the revision number from > ant. So, for now, we'll just have to remember to update the gump project > file when we shuffle through to various other alpha numbers > > > I think we should delete the jakarta-poi project (it points to a branch > > that has been discontinued) . The jakarta-poi-3 project is the only > > significant one at the moment. > > Is it safe to just remove it from cvs? It looks like the jakarta-slide > entry depends on jakarta-poi not jakarta-poi3, so I don't know how that > might affect things? > > Nick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi > The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/ > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
