Ya i have been thinking about starting over with a fresh new db to see 
if that fixes it. These are all running on debian sarge.

-- 
Jordan Tardif
DreamHost

On Fri, 11 May 2007, John Beaver wrote:

> Jordan Tardif wrote:
>> That was the 2nd email i sent  and that sample is from version 1.73 not
>> 1.80 .. this is from 1.80 .. quota was only at 73% at its highest.. you
>> can see that it clearly rejects one of the emails and then keeps counting
>> where it left off..
>>
>>
>> size=289/40960000, quota=42772/250000000, count=144/200(144),
>> rcpt=148/200(148), threshold=0%|71%|73%
>>
>> May  7 10:28:28 smarty policyd: rcpt=10101945, throttle=update(w),
>                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> host=208.113.175.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>> size=289/40960000, quota=42772/250000000, count=144/200(144),
>> rcpt=148/200(148), threshold=0%|71%|73%
>> May  7 10:28:28 smarty postfix/cleanup[22101]: 8070CEE278:
>> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> May  7 10:28:28 smarty postfix/smtpd[22063]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> ip-208-113-175-7.dreamhost.com[208.113.175.7]: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Recipient address rejected: Policy Rejection- --SENDER_QUOTA_REJECTION--;
>> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP
>> helo=<fadded.dreamhost.com>
>> May  7 10:28:29 smarty policyd: rcpt=10101954, throttle=update(w),
>                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> host=208.113.175.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>> size=289/40960000, quota=43061/250000000, count=145/200(145),
>> rcpt=149/200(149), threshold=0%|72%|74%
>> May  7 10:28:29 smarty policyd: rcpt=10101960, throttle=update(w),
>                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> host=208.113.175.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to=
>
>
> Each policyd log is an update (throttle==update) and would not cause a
> rejection.  The action in the policyd log would show "abuse".  If it
> were me, I would remove policyd and start over from scratch with v1.80
>
> I don't know what OS your running, but id you install this from source
> or from FreeBSD ports?  There was an strange issue when using FreeBSD
> ports where the maintainer made a bad patch and called it v1.81.  I
> think this has been fixed, but I would know as I only use the source
> directly.
>
> I have never seen this in any version and I have used it since inception.
>
> john
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> policyd-users mailing list
> policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
policyd-users mailing list
policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users

Reply via email to