John Beaver escreveu:
I would like to greylist connections that are trying to send messages to unknown addresses. Today those connections receives 'unknown user' and policyd never heard of them. I would like them to receive the Policy Rejection because of greylist=new and, IF they returns, policyd would give greylist=update and only then postfix would give 'unknown user'.Question is ..... having check_policy_service right after permit_mynetworks would allow connections trying to send email to unknown users to be greylisted ? I was thinking on having this:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_recipient_domain, permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031,reject_unauth_destination, reject_unlisted_recipientWould that be OK ?Will it work, yes. But what are you expecting to accomplish with this change?
I know this would increase triplet table size, but i dont care about that.
I dont know if simply changing the orders would be enough. If that's not enough, i would like to hear if the approach i'm looking can be, somehow, acchieved.
--
Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br
Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ policyd-users mailing list policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users
