On Saturday 09 July 2011 15:05:17 you wrote:
> > Well, I have a huge latency because of too much users, so that's kind
> > of what I need.
> 
> You're sufferring from buffer bloat.  Putting the right AQM on your
> router will help way more than any application-level hacks.
> 
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Queue_Management

Already activated.

> >> That's what Polipo does by default if the client only speaks /1.0.
> > 
> > Is that "legal" ? I mean, does the RFC says so, or is it some
> > Polipo-specific behavior ?
> 
> RFC 2616, Section 3.1:
> 
>    caching proxies MUST, gateways MAY, and tunnels MUST NOT upgrade the
>    request to the highest version they support. The proxy/gateway's
>    response to that request MUST be in the same major version as the
>    request.
> 
> Polipo is a caching proxy.
> 
> > (More seriously, I thought about the in-browser google-talk, which is
> > transmited using a single chunked connection).
> 
> Oh yuck.
> 
> There's no support in HTTP for multiplexing, so a persistent connection
> will use up a server-side slot for the length of its duration.

Ok, it's not that bad when you think of it: the connection supposedly stays up 
for hours, so you hardly get any bloat because of protocol overhead.

Well, thank you for your answers :)

-- 
Rémy Sanchez
http://hyperthese.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Polipo-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/polipo-users

Reply via email to