Unless the 300G is made of limited number of very large files, the performance won't be any better than squid. Assuming you compare them on the same hardware and OS. In my experience on FreeBSD, once the cache grow over 100G, the performance hit is significant. I have to delete all cached file and restart polipo to get it back to acceptable performance.
Ming > -----Original Message----- > From: Grégoire Leroy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Polipo-users] Cache size > > Hi, > > I would like to know if there are problems with huge cache (~300Go). > With > Squid, such cache added high latency (~10 second for connexion > initialization). Is this problem exist ? > > Furthermore, is video caching (youtube, facebook, aso...) available ? > > Thanks, > Grégoire Leroy > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously > valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, > security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > Polipo-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/polipo-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Polipo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/polipo-users
