I happened to speak to Russell on the phone after his email, and we
discussed how this point applies broadly: if it were socially
permissible to lurk outside someone's home and peek in the windows,
people would spend more on thicker window coverings or move
prancing-around-the-house-in-their-underwear activities into inner
rooms, at some cost to themselves.
To go back to the post that started this discussion, what I fail to
understand is why it is unreasonable to require that police secure a
search warrant before going on "trash dives" in alleys or backyards.
Previous Politech messages:
http://www.politechbot.com/2005/08/05/jonaathan-weinberg-on/
http://www.politechbot.com/2005/08/05/montana-supreme-court/
-Declan
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] Jonaathan Weinberg on 1984 and right to privacy
in your trash
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:43:04 -0400
From: Russell Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
True, we let strangers handle our trash and come take it away. But there
is a strong Hayekian norm that it is impolite to go through your
neighbor's trash. If that norm is destroyed, if our neighbors or the
government are liklely to paw through our trash, we will all behave very
differently with our credit card receipts and whatever intimate items we
now throw away. We will guard them, shred them, keep them. And the cost
will be high.
Russell Roberts
Professor of Economics
J. Fish and Lillian F. Smith Distinguished Scholar at the Mercatus Center
Department of Economics
4400 University Dr.
MSN 3G4
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA. 22030
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
